{"id":1210,"date":"2019-02-11T00:25:14","date_gmt":"2019-02-11T08:25:14","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/blogs.plm.automation.siemens.com\/t5\/Simcenter-Blog\/Simcenter-STAR-CCM-2019-1-Plasma-simulations-at-the-edge-of\/ba-p\/565476"},"modified":"2026-03-26T06:11:58","modified_gmt":"2026-03-26T10:11:58","slug":"simcenter-star-ccm-2019-1-plasma-simulations-at-the-edge-of-moores-law","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.sw.siemens.com\/simcenter\/simcenter-star-ccm-2019-1-plasma-simulations-at-the-edge-of-moores-law\/","title":{"rendered":"Simcenter STAR-CCM+ 2019.1: Plasma simulations at the edge of Moore\u2019s Law"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>In 1965 Gordon Moore, co-founder of Intel, noted that the number of transistors in an integrated circuit&nbsp;(IC)&nbsp;doubles every year, and&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.britannica.com\/technology\/Moores-law\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow noreferrer\">predicted<\/a>&nbsp;this trend would hold for at least a decade. Later the periodicity has been revised, most commonly defined as 18 months, and has been consistently used for long-term planning and target setting for R&amp;D in semiconductor industry. However lately there have been lots of discussions about the&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/medium.com\/@sgblank\/the-end-of-more-the-death-of-moores-law-5ddcfd8439dd\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow noreferrer\">probable death<\/a> of Moore&#8217;s law, since&nbsp;silicon-based&nbsp;semiconductor size is now approaching physical limits. Learning from history, the clock frequency stalled already ~13 years ago; check out the graph in this&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.karlrupp.net\/2018\/02\/42-years-of-microprocessor-trend-data\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow noreferrer\">blog<\/a>&nbsp;\u2013 although the number of transistors is still increasing the clock frequency stagnated around 4 GHz in 2006. This is due to hitting the \u201c<a href=\"https:\/\/www.quora.com\/Why-are-we-still-stuck-within-the-3-3-5-GHz-range-in-terms-of-processor-speed-Its-been-years-Whats-holding-us-down\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow noreferrer\">power wall<\/a>\u201d &#8211; the limit where leakage currents and heat production become significant enough to get faulty operation and overheating. Likewise, the transistor size cannot continue to shrink forever due to the finite size of the atom itself. The latest circuit printing technique available today allows for 7 nm structures on the chip. 7 nm &#8211; that\u2019s ~70 atoms! Below this size, migration of single atoms may damage the nanostructures of the IC, and quantum effects start to interfere. Thus it is impossible to go much further with similar technology, and the consistent shrinking in transistor size from 1960\u2019s to today, from mm to ~7 nm scale, is about to end. This doesn\u2019t mean technology advancements are over, technologies such as 3D patterning, improved packaging, using materials with higher conductivity, smarter layout and coding, application-specific integrated circuits and far out potentially quantum computing still advances our computational efficiency. But, the era of ever-decreasing transistor size is over. ~7 nm may be the end.<span data-ccp-props=\"{&quot;201341983&quot;:0,&quot;335559739&quot;:160,&quot;335559740&quot;:259}\">&nbsp;<\/span><\/p>\n<p>What does this have to do with <a href=\"https:\/\/www.plm.automation.siemens.com\/global\/en\/webinar\/semiconductor-fabrication-plasma-simulation\/59657\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">plasma<\/a>,&nbsp;<a href=\"http:\/\/pluto.space.swri.edu\/image\/glossary\/plasma.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow noreferrer\">the fourth state of matter<\/a>&nbsp;where electrons and ions roam free? Well, the technology that lets us get to 7 nm is&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/spectrum.ieee.org\/semiconductors\/nanotechnology\/euv-lithography-finally-ready-for-chip-manufacturing\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow noreferrer\">Extreme UltraViolet Litography<\/a>&nbsp;(EUVL), where 7 nm patterns are copied from a template to the wafer by ultraviolet light of 13.5 nm wavelength. The ultraviolet light is produced by photon emissions from a tin plasma.&nbsp;The EUV light is collected by a mirror and guided through the scanner to replicate the template pattern on the wafer. The mirror itself is exposed to the plasma, and is easily&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.researchgate.net\/publication\/241371151_Ion_damage_analysis_on_EUV_collector_mirrors\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow noreferrer\">damaged by high energy ion impacts<\/a>. Hence reduction of impact rate is highly desirable and any design changes which lowers the impact will extend the life time of the very expensive EUVL equipment. Simulations can aid design through analysis of plasma density, energy and extent. Even in the rest of the semiconductor manufacturing product line, which may consist of&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/semiengineering.com\/battling-fab-cycle-times\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow noreferrer\">hundreds of fabrication steps<\/a>, plasmas play a vital role;&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/book\/10.1002\/0471724254\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow noreferrer\">Lieberman &amp; Lichtenberg<\/a> noted in 2005 that one-third of the fabrication steps are typically plasma-based(!). Plasmas are used to etch wafers through plasma etching and to deposit materials on the wafer through sputtering physical vapor deposition (PVD) or plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition (PECVD).&nbsp;<span data-ccp-props=\"{&quot;201341983&quot;:0,&quot;335559739&quot;:160,&quot;335559740&quot;:259}\">&nbsp;<\/span><\/p>\n<p>To support technology&nbsp;development at the&nbsp;edge of validity of Moore\u2019s law,&nbsp;Simcenter&nbsp;STAR-CCM+ adds plasma chemistry simulation capabilities in the upcoming 2019.1 release. This allows you to study electron number density, ion concentration and electron temperature in low temperature plasmas, such as used in EUVL, sputtering PVD and PECVD processes.<span data-ccp-props=\"{&quot;201341983&quot;:0,&quot;335559739&quot;:160,&quot;335559740&quot;:259}\">&nbsp;<\/span><\/p>\n<p>To be specific, now you can read in&nbsp;any&nbsp;plasma&nbsp;chemistry in standard CHEMKIN\u2122 format in&nbsp;Simcenter&nbsp;STAR-CCM+,&nbsp;and solve the chemistry with the stiff chemistry solver CVODE, which&nbsp;is&nbsp;proven for its robustness&nbsp;and&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/community.plm.automation.siemens.com\/t5\/Simcenter-Blog\/The-fastest-chemistry-solver-on-the-CFD-market\/ba-p\/531014\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow noreferrer\">speed<\/a>&nbsp;for&nbsp;<a href=\"http:\/\/proceedings.asmedigitalcollection.asme.org\/proceeding.aspx?articleid=2650015\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow noreferrer\">combustion simulations<\/a>.<span data-ccp-props=\"{&quot;201341983&quot;:0,&quot;335559739&quot;:160,&quot;335559740&quot;:259}\">&nbsp;<\/span><\/p>\n<p>For an example see an inductively coupled argon plasma etcher below. The coil in the top of the picture is inducing an electromagnetic field through an alternating current of 13.56 MHz, strong enough to rip electrons off neutral argon atoms. The electrons are accelerated by the electromagnetic field, giving them high enough energy to excite or rip off further electrons of other argon atoms, creating a plasma of excited argon atoms, argon ions, neutral argon atoms, and electrons. The purpose of this plasma is to etch the wafer surface through bombardment of argon ions.<span data-ccp-props=\"{&quot;201341983&quot;:0,&quot;335559739&quot;:160,&quot;335559740&quot;:259}\">&nbsp;<\/span><\/p>\n<p>The electron energy source from the electromagnetic field is shown on the left-hand side, and the corresponding cloud of free electrons on the right-hand side. The electron density peak is slightly further away from the Quartz crystal than the peak of the Electron energy source field since neutralization of electrons by the surface reduces the number of electrons close to the crystal.<span data-ccp-props=\"{&quot;201341983&quot;:0,&quot;335559739&quot;:160,&quot;335559740&quot;:259}\">&nbsp;<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span data-ccp-props=\"{&quot;201341983&quot;:0,&quot;335559739&quot;:160,&quot;335559740&quot;:259}\"><span class=\"lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline\" style=\"width: 999px\"><img decoding=\"async\" title=\"Image1_Design1_ElectronEnSource_NbrDens.png\" src=\"http:\/\/blogs.sw.siemens.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/6\/2019\/09\/Image1_Design1_ElectronEnSource_NbrDens-1.png\" alt=\"Image1_Design1_ElectronEnSource_NbrDens.png\"><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span class=\"TextRun SCXW14859252\"><span class=\"NormalTextRun SCXW14859252\">The corresponding cloud of&nbsp;<\/span><span class=\"NormalTextRun SCXW14859252\">a<\/span><span class=\"NormalTextRun SCXW14859252\">rgon ions, which&nbsp;<\/span><span class=\"NormalTextRun SCXW14859252\">a<\/span><span class=\"NormalTextRun SCXW14859252\">re used to etch the surf<\/span><span class=\"NormalTextRun SCXW14859252\">a<\/span><span class=\"NormalTextRun SCXW14859252\">ce, is shown in the picture below. The&nbsp;<\/span><span class=\"NormalTextRun SCXW14859252\">a<\/span><span class=\"NormalTextRun SCXW14859252\">rgon ion cloud is very simil<\/span><span class=\"NormalTextRun SCXW14859252\">a<\/span><span class=\"NormalTextRun SCXW14859252\">r in sh<\/span><span class=\"NormalTextRun SCXW14859252\">a<\/span><span class=\"NormalTextRun SCXW14859252\">pe to the electron number density since the electrons induce the ions.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span class=\"lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline\" style=\"width: 999px\"><img decoding=\"async\" title=\"Image2_Design1_Argon_NbrDensElectron.png\" src=\"http:\/\/blogs.sw.siemens.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/6\/2019\/09\/Image2_Design1_Argon_NbrDensElectron-1.png\" alt=\"Image2_Design1_Argon_NbrDensElectron.png\"><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span class=\"EOP SCXW14859252\" data-ccp-props=\"{&quot;201341983&quot;:0,&quot;335559739&quot;:160,&quot;335559740&quot;:259}\"><span class=\"TextRun SCXW9686863\"><span class=\"NormalTextRun SCXW9686863\">The&nbsp;<\/span><\/span><a class=\"Hyperlink SCXW9686863\" href=\"https:\/\/iopscience.iop.org\/article\/10.1088\/1674-4926\/34\/6\/066004\/meta\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer nofollow\"><span class=\"TextRun Underlined SCXW9686863\"><span class=\"NormalTextRun SCXW9686863\">a<\/span><span class=\"NormalTextRun SCXW9686863\">rgon chemistry<\/span><\/span><\/a><span class=\"TextRun SCXW9686863\"><span class=\"NormalTextRun SCXW9686863\">&nbsp;used in this simul<\/span><span class=\"NormalTextRun SCXW9686863\">a<\/span><span class=\"NormalTextRun SCXW9686863\">tion includes three re<\/span><span class=\"NormalTextRun SCXW9686863\">a<\/span><span class=\"NormalTextRun SCXW9686863\">ctions;&nbsp;<\/span><span class=\"NormalTextRun SCXW9686863\">a<\/span><span class=\"NormalTextRun SCXW9686863\">rgon excit<\/span><span class=\"NormalTextRun SCXW9686863\">a<\/span><span class=\"NormalTextRun SCXW9686863\">tion, ioniz<\/span><span class=\"NormalTextRun SCXW9686863\">a<\/span><span class=\"NormalTextRun SCXW9686863\">tion&nbsp;<\/span><span class=\"NormalTextRun SCXW9686863\">a<\/span><span class=\"NormalTextRun SCXW9686863\">nd stepwise ioniz<\/span><span class=\"NormalTextRun SCXW9686863\">a<\/span><span class=\"NormalTextRun SCXW9686863\">tion.&nbsp;<\/span><\/span><span class=\"TextRun SCXW9686863\"><span class=\"NormalTextRun SCXW9686863\">The momentum tr<\/span><span class=\"NormalTextRun SCXW9686863\">a<\/span><span class=\"NormalTextRun SCXW9686863\">nsfer re<\/span><span class=\"NormalTextRun SCXW9686863\">a<\/span><span class=\"NormalTextRun SCXW9686863\">ctions&nbsp;<\/span><span class=\"NormalTextRun SCXW9686863\">a<\/span><span class=\"NormalTextRun SCXW9686863\">re included in the model implicitly.<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span class=\"EOP SCXW14859252\" data-ccp-props=\"{&quot;201341983&quot;:0,&quot;335559739&quot;:160,&quot;335559740&quot;:259}\"><span class=\"TextRun SCXW9686863\"><span class=\"lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline\" style=\"width: 669px\"><img decoding=\"async\" title=\"Image4_Reactionscheme.png\" src=\"http:\/\/blogs.sw.siemens.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/6\/2019\/09\/Image4_Reactionscheme-1.png\" alt=\"Image4_Reactionscheme.png\"><\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p>This is&nbsp;a&nbsp;somewhat simplified scheme. Extended schemes or schemes for other species can be obtained from&nbsp;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.quantemoldb.com\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow noreferrer\">Quantemol<\/a>,&nbsp;an expert company within the field of plasma&nbsp;chemistry, whom we rely on for help&nbsp;and guidance.<span data-ccp-props=\"{&quot;201341983&quot;:0,&quot;335559739&quot;:160,&quot;335559740&quot;:259}\">&nbsp;<\/span><\/p>\n<p>The&nbsp;etching profile at the wafer surface&nbsp;needs to be as uniform as possible. To achieve that four different designs are studied:<span data-ccp-props=\"{&quot;201341983&quot;:0,&quot;335559739&quot;:160,&quot;335559740&quot;:259}\">&nbsp;<\/span><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"list-style-type: none\">\n<ul>\n<li data-leveltext=\"\uf0b7\" data-font=\"Symbol\" data-listid=\"1\" data-aria-posinset=\"0\" data-aria-level=\"1\">Table positioned 4, 5 and 6 cm from&nbsp;the&nbsp;crystal&nbsp;surface<span data-ccp-props=\"{&quot;134233279&quot;:true,&quot;201341983&quot;:0,&quot;335559739&quot;:160,&quot;335559740&quot;:259}\">&nbsp;<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"list-style-type: none\">\n<ul>\n<li data-leveltext=\"\uf0b7\" data-font=\"Symbol\" data-listid=\"1\" data-aria-posinset=\"0\" data-aria-level=\"1\">Coil&nbsp;and crystal widened by&nbsp;4&nbsp;cm.<span data-ccp-props=\"{&quot;134233279&quot;:true,&quot;201341983&quot;:0,&quot;335559739&quot;:160,&quot;335559740&quot;:259}\">&nbsp;<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>First, the effect of table position is investigated. See below for visualisation of the electron energy source term&nbsp;from the electromagnetic field&nbsp;and&nbsp;the corresponding electron number density.<span data-ccp-props=\"{&quot;201341983&quot;:0,&quot;335559739&quot;:160,&quot;335559740&quot;:259}\">&nbsp;<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span data-ccp-props=\"{&quot;201341983&quot;:0,&quot;335559739&quot;:160,&quot;335559740&quot;:259}\"><span class=\"lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline\" style=\"width: 999px\"><img decoding=\"async\" title=\"Image4_TablePosition_ElectronEnAndNbrDens.png\" src=\"http:\/\/blogs.sw.siemens.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/6\/2019\/09\/Image4_TablePosition_ElectronEnAndNbrDens-1.png\" alt=\"Image4_TablePosition_ElectronEnAndNbrDens.png\"><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p>Note the increased electron density for lower table placement. The ions&nbsp;and electrons&nbsp;are neutralised by the walls,&nbsp;and thus the more space between coil&nbsp;and table, the higher the plasma&nbsp;density.&nbsp;A&nbsp;higher number of free electrons increases the plasma&nbsp;conductivity, which is why the electron energy source term&nbsp;also increases by lower table placement.&nbsp;<span data-ccp-props=\"{&quot;201341983&quot;:0,&quot;335559739&quot;:160,&quot;335559740&quot;:259}\">&nbsp;<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Next, let us investigate the effect on etching rate by plotting ion bombardment radially&nbsp;along the table surface, calculated through&nbsp;imposing&nbsp;a&nbsp;flux boundary condition&nbsp;at the surface. See the plot below.<span data-ccp-props=\"{&quot;201341983&quot;:0,&quot;335559739&quot;:160,&quot;335559740&quot;:259}\">&nbsp;<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span data-ccp-props=\"{&quot;201341983&quot;:0,&quot;335559739&quot;:160,&quot;335559740&quot;:259}\"><span class=\"lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline\" style=\"width: 850px\"><img decoding=\"async\" title=\"Image5_Jia_2010_ICP_Etcher_03_150A_CADupdate_Design01_reruntocheck_Ar+ Flux at Table surface - distance.png\" src=\"http:\/\/blogs.sw.siemens.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/6\/2019\/09\/Image5_Jia_2010_ICP_Etcher_03_150A_CADupdate_Design01_reruntocheck_Ar-Flux-at-Table-surface-distance-1.png\" alt=\"Image5_Jia_2010_ICP_Etcher_03_150A_CADupdate_Design01_reruntocheck_Ar+ Flux at Table surface - distance.png\"><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p>Two things&nbsp;are notable here;&nbsp;The&nbsp;lower the table placement, the lower the ion bombardment,&nbsp;giving&nbsp;a&nbsp;lower&nbsp;etching rate. But the homogeneity is&nbsp;also decreased when moving the table further down, which is undesirable. This is due to the higher peak electron&nbsp;and ion concentration in the&nbsp;centre&nbsp;of the plasma.<span data-ccp-props=\"{&quot;201341983&quot;:0,&quot;335559739&quot;:160,&quot;335559740&quot;:259}\">&nbsp;<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Can we&nbsp;reduce the inhomogeneity by stretching the coil&nbsp;and thus stretching the plasma? Let\u2019s try.&nbsp;In the picture below the coil&nbsp;and crystal is stretched by 4&nbsp;cm.&nbsp;<span data-ccp-props=\"{&quot;201341983&quot;:0,&quot;335559739&quot;:160,&quot;335559740&quot;:259}\">&nbsp;<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span data-ccp-props=\"{&quot;201341983&quot;:0,&quot;335559739&quot;:160,&quot;335559740&quot;:259}\"><span class=\"lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline\" style=\"width: 999px\"><img decoding=\"async\" title=\"Image6_stretched_ElectronEn_Dens.png\" src=\"http:\/\/blogs.sw.siemens.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/6\/2019\/09\/Image6_stretched_ElectronEn_Dens-1.png\" alt=\"Image6_stretched_ElectronEn_Dens.png\"><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span data-ccp-props=\"{&quot;201341983&quot;:0,&quot;335559739&quot;:160,&quot;335559740&quot;:259}\"><span class=\"TextRun SCXW246429707\"><span class=\"NormalTextRun SCXW246429707\">The pl<\/span><span class=\"NormalTextRun SCXW246429707\">a<\/span><span class=\"NormalTextRun SCXW246429707\">sm<\/span><span class=\"NormalTextRun SCXW246429707\">a<\/span><span class=\"NormalTextRun SCXW246429707\">&nbsp;is consequently more stretched out,&nbsp;<\/span><span class=\"NormalTextRun SCXW246429707\">a<\/span><span class=\"NormalTextRun SCXW246429707\">nd it&nbsp;<\/span><span class=\"NormalTextRun SCXW246429707\">a<\/span><span class=\"NormalTextRun SCXW246429707\">ppe<\/span><span class=\"NormalTextRun SCXW246429707\">a<\/span><span class=\"NormalTextRun SCXW246429707\">rs the electron number density close to the t<\/span><span class=\"NormalTextRun SCXW246429707\">a<\/span><span class=\"NormalTextRun SCXW246429707\">ble is more evenly spre<\/span><span class=\"NormalTextRun SCXW246429707\">a<\/span><span class=\"NormalTextRun SCXW246429707\">d th<\/span><span class=\"NormalTextRun SCXW246429707\">a<\/span><span class=\"NormalTextRun SCXW246429707\">n in the previous c<\/span><span class=\"NormalTextRun SCXW246429707\">a<\/span><span class=\"NormalTextRun SCXW246429707\">ses. Interrog<\/span><span class=\"NormalTextRun SCXW246429707\">a<\/span><span class=\"NormalTextRun SCXW246429707\">ting the ion bomb<\/span><span class=\"NormalTextRun SCXW246429707\">a<\/span><span class=\"NormalTextRun SCXW246429707\">rdment&nbsp;<\/span><span class=\"NormalTextRun SCXW246429707\">a<\/span><span class=\"NormalTextRun SCXW246429707\">t the t<\/span><span class=\"NormalTextRun SCXW246429707\">a<\/span><span class=\"NormalTextRun SCXW246429707\">ble surf<\/span><span class=\"NormalTextRun SCXW246429707\">a<\/span><span class=\"NormalTextRun SCXW246429707\">ce it is evident th<\/span><span class=\"NormalTextRun SCXW246429707\">a<\/span><span class=\"NormalTextRun SCXW246429707\">t,&nbsp;<\/span><span class=\"NormalTextRun SCXW246429707\">a<\/span><span class=\"NormalTextRun SCXW246429707\">lthough there is still&nbsp;<\/span><span class=\"NormalTextRun SCXW246429707\">a<\/span><span class=\"NormalTextRun SCXW246429707\">&nbsp;signific<\/span><span class=\"NormalTextRun SCXW246429707\">a<\/span><span class=\"NormalTextRun SCXW246429707\">nt pe<\/span><span class=\"NormalTextRun SCXW246429707\">a<\/span><span class=\"NormalTextRun SCXW246429707\">k, the bomb<\/span><span class=\"NormalTextRun SCXW246429707\">a<\/span><span class=\"NormalTextRun SCXW246429707\">rdment is more evenly spre<\/span><span class=\"NormalTextRun SCXW246429707\">a<\/span><span class=\"NormalTextRun SCXW246429707\">d. The difference between m<\/span><span class=\"NormalTextRun SCXW246429707\">a<\/span><span class=\"NormalTextRun SCXW246429707\">in pe<\/span><span class=\"NormalTextRun SCXW246429707\">a<\/span><span class=\"NormalTextRun SCXW246429707\">k v<\/span><span class=\"NormalTextRun SCXW246429707\">a<\/span><span class=\"NormalTextRun SCXW246429707\">lue&nbsp;<\/span><span class=\"NormalTextRun SCXW246429707\">a<\/span><span class=\"NormalTextRun SCXW246429707\">nd edge is 40%, comp<\/span><span class=\"NormalTextRun SCXW246429707\">a<\/span><span class=\"NormalTextRun SCXW246429707\">red to 70% for the b<\/span><span class=\"NormalTextRun SCXW246429707\">a<\/span><span class=\"NormalTextRun SCXW246429707\">seline c<\/span><span class=\"NormalTextRun SCXW246429707\">a<\/span><span class=\"NormalTextRun SCXW246429707\">se.<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span data-ccp-props=\"{&quot;201341983&quot;:0,&quot;335559739&quot;:160,&quot;335559740&quot;:259}\"><span class=\"TextRun SCXW246429707\"><span class=\"NormalTextRun SCXW246429707\"><span class=\"lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline\" style=\"width: 850px\"><img decoding=\"async\" title=\"Image7_Jia_2010_ICP_Etcher_03_150A_CADupdate_Design01_reruntocheck_Ar+ Flux at Table surface - stretched.png\" src=\"http:\/\/blogs.sw.siemens.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/6\/2019\/09\/Image7_Jia_2010_ICP_Etcher_03_150A_CADupdate_Design01_reruntocheck_Ar-Flux-at-Table-surface-stretched-1.png\" alt=\"Image7_Jia_2010_ICP_Etcher_03_150A_CADupdate_Design01_reruntocheck_Ar+ Flux at Table surface - stretched.png\"><\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p>The wider coil placement is thus&nbsp;a&nbsp;potentially better design for this etcher,&nbsp;and further studies could be made by varying inlet rates, pressure, number of coils etc.<\/p>\n<p><span data-ccp-props=\"{&quot;201341983&quot;:0,&quot;335559739&quot;:160,&quot;335559740&quot;:259}\">&nbsp;<\/span><\/p>\n<p>I hope this serves&nbsp;as&nbsp;a&nbsp;demonstration of what can be learnt through plasma&nbsp;simulations.<span data-ccp-props=\"{&quot;201341983&quot;:0,&quot;335559739&quot;:160,&quot;335559740&quot;:259}\">&nbsp;<\/span><\/p>\n<p>With this new functionality in&nbsp;Simcenter&nbsp;STAR-CCM+ we hope to support the evolution of computational power&nbsp;at the&nbsp;edge&nbsp;of&nbsp;and beyond Moore\u2019s law. Don\u2019t hesitate to contact us for further information!<span data-ccp-props=\"{&quot;201341983&quot;:0,&quot;335559739&quot;:160,&quot;335559740&quot;:259}\">&nbsp;<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Learn more about plasma simulation using multi-physics software to model plasma processes in semiconductor fabrication in <a href=\"https:\/\/www.plm.automation.siemens.com\/global\/en\/webinar\/semiconductor-fabrication-plasma-simulation\/59657\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">this webinar<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In 1965 Gordon Moore, co-founder of Intel, noted that the number of transistors in an integrated circuit&nbsp;  (IC)&nbsp;  doubles every year, and&nbsp;  predicted  &nbsp;this trend would hold for a&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":48653,"featured_media":1232,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"spanish_translation":"","french_translation":"","german_translation":"","italian_translation":"","polish_translation":"","japanese_translation":"","chinese_translation":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[5,242],"industry":[],"product":[513],"coauthors":[],"class_list":["post-1210","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-news","tag-cae-simulation","tag-computational-fluid-dynamics-cfd","product-simcenter-star-ccm"],"featured_image_url":"https:\/\/blogs.sw.siemens.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/6\/2019\/09\/Image7_Jia_2010_ICP_Etcher_03_150A_CADupdate_Design01_reruntocheck_Ar-Flux-at-Table-surface-stretched-1.png","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.sw.siemens.com\/simcenter\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1210","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.sw.siemens.com\/simcenter\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.sw.siemens.com\/simcenter\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.sw.siemens.com\/simcenter\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/48653"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.sw.siemens.com\/simcenter\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1210"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.sw.siemens.com\/simcenter\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1210\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":20388,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.sw.siemens.com\/simcenter\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1210\/revisions\/20388"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.sw.siemens.com\/simcenter\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1232"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.sw.siemens.com\/simcenter\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1210"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.sw.siemens.com\/simcenter\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1210"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.sw.siemens.com\/simcenter\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1210"},{"taxonomy":"industry","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.sw.siemens.com\/simcenter\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/industry?post=1210"},{"taxonomy":"product","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.sw.siemens.com\/simcenter\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/product?post=1210"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.sw.siemens.com\/simcenter\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=1210"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}