{"id":6822,"date":"2014-03-13T10:52:59","date_gmt":"2014-03-13T09:52:59","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/blogs.mentor.com\/colinwalls\/?p=6822"},"modified":"2026-03-26T16:42:53","modified_gmt":"2026-03-26T20:42:53","slug":"set-in-stone","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.sw.siemens.com\/embedded-software\/2014\/03\/13\/set-in-stone\/","title":{"rendered":"Set in stone"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Technological progress is a curious thing and brings out strange reactions in people. Some people adopt a new technology just because it is new; others eschew it for the exact same reason. I aspire to take the middle ground &#8211; appreciating technology when it is useful and somewhat proven, instead of being an early adopter.<\/p>\n<p>At the weekend, I found myself in a discussion about books and their future &#8230;<!--more--><\/p>\n<p>As I have written about before [<a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.mentor.com\/colinwalls\/blog\/2010\/05\/13\/books-and-e-books\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">here<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.mentor.com\/colinwalls\/blog\/2011\/05\/19\/e-reading\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">here<\/a>] I am very keen on e-books and now read almost exclusively using this medium. I still like &#8220;real&#8221; books, but, for everyday reading, I think they have done their time.<\/p>\n<p>In the town where I live there used to be an independent bookshop. The owners decided to retire and were unable to find a buyer for the business, so it closed down a couple of years ago. A group of people thought that the town should have a bookshop and decided to establish a co-operative shop. This runs much like any other small business, except that it has a large number of shareholders, each of whom own an equal sized, but small, share. My wife and I are among that number.<\/p>\n<p>At the weekend, I had been participating in a historic walking tour in the town, which ended with tea and cake at the shop, which was how I found myself debating the pros and cons of e-books vs &#8220;real&#8221; books. The couple, with whom I was discussing this matter, were convinced that e-books are a passing fad and that they are totally impractical. They had some interesting arguments against e-books:<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;They do not feel and smell so nice.&#8221; I agree, but I do not really use either of those senses to read.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Their battery can run out.&#8221; Also true, particularly with an iPad, from which I only get 10 hours or so use from a charge. But I am a heavy user of my Kindle, which only needs charging about once a month and gives me adequate warning.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;They are not flexible &#8211; you cannot fold them up like paper.&#8221; I feel that flexibility is not an attribute that most books gain a lot of benefit from. I do not find my Kindle&#8217;s [mechanical] inflexibility a problem. I can, however, easily envisage more &#8220;floppy&#8221; devices being available in the future.<\/p>\n<p>The argument that they did not pose was &#8220;You cannot lend e-books or pass them on when you are finished.&#8221; That is currently true, but it is a business model issue, which is not intrinsic to the technology. Consumer demand will result in this evolving, IMHO.<\/p>\n<p>I, of course, had a whole bunch of arguments in favor of e-books: compact and easy to carry hundreds of books; easy searching and place-marking; simple, low-cost production benefits new authors. The list goes on.<\/p>\n<p>But then the produced their killer argument: &#8220;Paper has served us very well in one form or another for hundreds or even thousands of years. Why do we need to replace it?&#8221; Nicely played, I thought.<\/p>\n<p>In a way they were right. Paper has been around a long time in various forms &#8211; papyrus, parchment and vellum all preceding modern paper. It has done a good job and I do not think that we will be abandoning it any time soon. I suggested that we imagine the world when paper was first introduced &#8230;<\/p>\n<p>There were, undoubtedly, objectors to this new-fangled technology. They would argue in favor of carving text onto stone tablets. I can imagine they might suggest: &#8220;Paper just does not last &#8211; it soon yellows and ink fades. Stone lasts for ever.&#8221; &#8220;Paper is susceptible to burning and damp. It is just not as resilient as stone.&#8221; &#8220;Stone tablets were good enough for Moses.&#8221; &#8220;Paper is just not practical and will never catch on.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Fast forwarding to the present day, people still carve text onto stone. In fact, a friend of mine has recently been on a course to learn the skill. We still use stone tablets when we really want something to last &#8211; or at least have the appearance of permanence. Building names and gravestones are good examples. In the same way, paper will have it&#8217;s place. Paper books have an intrinsically pleasurable &#8220;feel&#8221; to them, which means that they will persist, particularly as premium products.<\/p>\n<p>But, trust me on this one: e-books are here to stay.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Technological progress is a curious thing and brings out strange reactions in people. Some people adopt a new technology just&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":71677,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"spanish_translation":"","french_translation":"","german_translation":"","italian_translation":"","polish_translation":"","japanese_translation":"","chinese_translation":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[302],"industry":[],"product":[],"coauthors":[],"class_list":["post-6822","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news","tag-off-topic"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.sw.siemens.com\/embedded-software\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6822","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.sw.siemens.com\/embedded-software\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.sw.siemens.com\/embedded-software\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.sw.siemens.com\/embedded-software\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/71677"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.sw.siemens.com\/embedded-software\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6822"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.sw.siemens.com\/embedded-software\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6822\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":10252,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.sw.siemens.com\/embedded-software\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6822\/revisions\/10252"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.sw.siemens.com\/embedded-software\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6822"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.sw.siemens.com\/embedded-software\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6822"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.sw.siemens.com\/embedded-software\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6822"},{"taxonomy":"industry","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.sw.siemens.com\/embedded-software\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/industry?post=6822"},{"taxonomy":"product","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.sw.siemens.com\/embedded-software\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/product?post=6822"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.sw.siemens.com\/embedded-software\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=6822"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}