{"id":4363,"date":"2013-01-31T11:44:12","date_gmt":"2013-01-31T10:44:12","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/blogs.mentor.com\/colinwalls\/?p=4363"},"modified":"2026-03-26T16:39:44","modified_gmt":"2026-03-26T20:39:44","slug":"the-hype-cycle","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.sw.siemens.com\/embedded-software\/2013\/01\/31\/the-hype-cycle\/","title":{"rendered":"The Hype Cycle"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>I have always been interested in technology and innovation. I do not think of myself as a &#8220;gadget freak&#8221;, though others might have a different view. However, when something new comes along, even if I am not an &#8220;early adopter&#8221;, I am always on the lookout for things that might improve my life.<\/p>\n<p>Sadly, I am often disappointed. So often a device either does not work at all or simply fails to live up to expectations. This is making me more cautious. I thought that this was just a phenomenon that was associated with age, but I recently discovered that it is much more general &#8230;<!--more--><\/p>\n<p>I am sure that everyone is familiar with the sequence of events when a new technology becomes available or a new gadget is announced. It starts off as the greatest thing since sliced bread and is going to solve a whole load of problems. It never quite delivers on this promise and everyone is disappointed. Then a surge of realism occurs and the technology\/device finds its right place in the world.<\/p>\n<p>I can think of any number of examples where this pattern has occurred: radio, television, telephone, the Internet, personal computers, smart phones, tablets &#8230; I now learn that this sequence is called the <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Hype_cycle\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Hype Cycle<\/a> and it looks like this:<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.sw.siemens.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/51\/2013\/01\/Gartner_Hype_Cycle.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-4367\" src=\"https:\/\/blogs.sw.siemens.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/51\/2013\/01\/Gartner_Hype_Cycle.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"500\" height=\"325\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>It was mooted by Gartner about 20 years ago and I think that it makes a lot of sense. Their perception of its use seemed to be from a purchaser&#8217;s point of view. If you can figure out where something is on the Hype Cycle, you can decide whether it is the time to invest [in the product or the company behind it].<\/p>\n<p>I have been pondering whether it has other uses. As I work in marketing, I wondered if it could be a tool for determining how to present or portray a product. Possible approaches, given the knowledge of a product&#8217;s current place in the cycle, might be &#8220;Best thing since sliced bread&#8221;, &#8220;Not as bad as others on the market&#8221;, &#8220;Solid and well established&#8221; &#8230;<\/p>\n<p>BTW, it seems to me that the Hype Cycle is not really a cycle, which implies some repetition. Maybe the Hype Curve or Hype Trajectory might be a better term.<\/p>\n<p>BTW2, sliced bread was first sold nearly a century ago. What did people use as the benchmark for goodness before then?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I have always been interested in technology and innovation. I do not think of myself as a &#8220;gadget freak&#8221;, though&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":71677,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"spanish_translation":"","french_translation":"","german_translation":"","italian_translation":"","polish_translation":"","japanese_translation":"","chinese_translation":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[302],"industry":[],"product":[],"coauthors":[],"class_list":["post-4363","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news","tag-off-topic"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.sw.siemens.com\/embedded-software\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4363","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.sw.siemens.com\/embedded-software\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.sw.siemens.com\/embedded-software\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.sw.siemens.com\/embedded-software\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/71677"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.sw.siemens.com\/embedded-software\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4363"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.sw.siemens.com\/embedded-software\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4363\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":10140,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.sw.siemens.com\/embedded-software\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4363\/revisions\/10140"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.sw.siemens.com\/embedded-software\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4363"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.sw.siemens.com\/embedded-software\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4363"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.sw.siemens.com\/embedded-software\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4363"},{"taxonomy":"industry","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.sw.siemens.com\/embedded-software\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/industry?post=4363"},{"taxonomy":"product","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.sw.siemens.com\/embedded-software\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/product?post=4363"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.sw.siemens.com\/embedded-software\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=4363"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}